Students Overall Evaluation of the Programme and Teaching

एम.व्ही.पी. समाजाचे

के. टी. एच. एम. महाविद्यालय

(के.आर.टी. कला, बी.एच. वाणिज्य, ए.एम. विज्ञान महाविद्यालय.)

MVP SAMAJ'S

K.T.H.M. COLLEGE, Nashik

(K.R.T. Arts, B.H. Commerce and A.M. Science College.)

Admission for
Academic 2019-20

Golden Jubilee
Celebration 1969-2019

IQAC Login for Faculty

Academics / Departments

Arts Commerce Science Animation Video Production Other

Programmes IQAC Examination Cell Research & Publications Placement Cell Library Sports NCC

NCC Army Boys NCC Girls NCC Naval

NSS Student Development Alumni Feedback

Parents Feedback Form Feedback From Alumni Students Feedback on Teaching and Curriculum Students Feedback on College Campus Students Feedback on Teachers Students Feedback on Library Employer Feedback- About the Employee Teachers Feedback on College

Distance Education

IGNOU YCMOU

NAAQM Photo Gallery Downloads Green Audit Linkages NIRF Start-Up & Innovation Cell Career Advancement Scheme (CAS)

Students Overall Evaluation of the Programme and Teaching

* Program:

* Department:

* Year:

* Secutiry Code

Feedback

Sr. No	Parameters	A	B	C	D
1.	The syllabus of each course was	Adequate	Inadequate	Challenging	Dull
2.	Background for benefiting from the courses was	More than adequate	Adequate	Inadequate	Cannot say
3.	Were the courses easy or difficult to understand?	Easy	Manageable	Difficult	Very difficult
4.	FIow much of the syllabi were covered in the classes?	85 to 100%	70 to 85%	55 to 70%	less than 55%
5.	What is your opinion about the library material and facilities for the courses?	more than adequate	adequate	inadequate	very poor
6.	To what extent were you able to get material for the prescribed readings?	Easily	with some difficulty	not available at all	with great diffrculty
7.	How well did the teachers prepare for the classe	thoroughly	satisfactorily	poorly	indifferently
8.	How well were the teachers able to communicate?	Always effective	sometimes effective	Just satisfactorily	generally ineffective
9.	How far the teachers encourage student participation in class?	mostly yes	sometimes	not at all	always
10.	If yes, which of the following methods were used?	Encouraged to raise questions	get involved in discussion in class	encourage discussion outside class	did not encourage
11.	How helpful were the teachers in advising?	Very helpful	sometimes helpful	not at all helpful	did not advise
12.	The teachers' approach can best be described as	Always courteous	sometimes rude	always indifferent	cannot say
13.	Internal assessment was	Always fair	sometimes unfair	Usually unfair	sometimes fair
14.	What effect do you think the internal assessment will have on your course grade?	Helps to improve	discouraging	no special effect	sometimes effective
15.	How often did the teachers provide feedback on your performance?	Regularly/in time	with helpful comment	often/ late	without any comments
16.	Were your assignments discussed with you?	Yes, fully	yes, partly	not discussed at all	sornetimes discussed
17.	Were you provided with a course contributory lecture too at the beginning	Yes	no
17.	If yes, was it helpful?	Yes	no
18.	If you have other comments to offer on the courses and suggestions for the teachers you may do so in the space given below or on a separate shee

Visitor Number:

Label Designed and Developed by - Computer Science Department